The PRRT

Petroleum Resource Rent Tax

Status Broken by design

The tax designed to make citizens benefit from gas super-profits. It collects almost nothing: deductions and deferrals engineered to defer liability for decades.

Last on record: 2026-09
Named in: 20 articles
Across: 3 cases

Named in 20 articles across 3 cases 30 connections: companies 14, lobbies 1, mechanisms 3, regulators and bodies 3, agencies and departments 2, parties and organisations 1, people 6

Key figure on file

A$1.5 billion

PRRT forecast for 2025–26: less than beer excise, and heading downward. Treasury, Senate Estimates 2026

Articles naming it

Cases it recurs across

Linked in the graph

Figures on file

Fig. 01 / Where this name appears

Australia's Gas HeistA$1.5 billionPRRT forecast for 2025–26: less than beer excise, and heading downward.14 articles →The Inflation Rort55 articles →The War Trade11 article →

Fig. 01Source: article scan · every article naming itAs of 2026‑09Auto-assembled

Fig. 02 / On the record

A$1.5 billionPRRT forecast for 2025–26: less than beer excise, and heading downward.Source: Treasury, Senate Estimates 2026Beer, HECS, and the broken tax →
ZeroTreasury’s own Budget Papers in 2023 stated plainly: ‘To date, not a single LNG project has paid any PRRT.’Source: Treasury Budget Papers, 2023Beer, HECS, and the broken tax →
-8%Marginal excess burden of the PRRT: meaning increasing the tax by one dollar generates eight cents in additional economic benefitSource: ANU Tax and Transfer Policy Institute, Chris Murphy, 2025How they killed the mining tax →
Up to 58% government shareIEEFA modelling finds that through refundable PRRT closing-down credits and income-tax deductions, the government's effective share of some offshore projects' decommissioning costs could reach around 58 per cent. This is a modelled estimate, not a payout recorded to date.Source: IEEFA / ACCR analysisThe A$60 billion boomerang: who cleans up the offshore rigs when the gas money is gone →
US$210-410m benefitWoodside's guided statutory PRRT outcome for the half year to 30 June 2026. The same table guides an underlying PRRT expense of US$190-390m; the gap is the one-off Pluto deferred tax asset adjustment of approximately US$600m pre-income tax.Source: Woodside Second Quarter Report 2026 half-year guidance [1]The boom that paid Woodside back →
A$796mPRRT paid by Woodside in 2023-24, alongside A$2.26bn in corporate income tax, making it Australia's largest PRRT payer.Source: ATO Corporate Tax Transparency 2023-24, as reported by Woodside [4]The boom that paid Woodside back →
Chevron A$0 PRRT on A$26.9 billion; Santos A$213 million on A$8.3 billionOn evidence before the inquiry, in 2023-24 Chevron paid A$0 in PRRT on A$26.9 billion in revenue, while Santos paid A$213 million on A$8.3 billion.Source: ATO transparency data cited in the committee report, 7 May 2026The inquiry that couldn't agree →
INPEX A$0 PRRT and A$0 royalties; ConocoPhillips A$0 PRRT on A$17 billionThe report records that INPEX paid A$0 PRRT, A$0 royalties and A$484 million company tax on A$81.3 billion of income, and that ConocoPhillips paid A$0 PRRT on A$17 billion of sales.Source: Committee report, 7 May 2026 (ATO transparency data)The inquiry that couldn't agree →

Fig. 02Source: figures on file for this name, each tied to the article it came fromAs of 2026‑09Auto-assembled

Fig. 03 / Named together

The 12 names most often in the same articles as The PRRT. A line's weight, and the number by each name, is how many articles name both. Grey chords join the neighbours most often named together themselves (two articles or more). Circles are people and organisations, squares are mechanisms. Named together is all this shows: it is not a finding about what the relationship is.

Fig. 03Source: article scan · articles naming bothAs of 2026‑09Auto-assembled